II Thessalonians

Chapter 2

The man of lawlessness key facts?

There is no evidence that the man of Lawlessness is the antichrist of John's letters.
The antichrist is identified as anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Many antichrists had already come, so the antichrist was not being held back.

Some say it was the Roman Caesars, or one of the Caesars (Domitian) who did set himself up as a god in the actual former temple of God in Jerusalem. This temple was no longer the temple of God.
There is no evidence that the man of lawlessness is the Sea Beast in Revelation 13.
The other option is the Papacy.

Paul was writing to the church, which is the temple of God. (I Corinthians 3:16,17)
The Jerusalem temple was no longer the temple of God.

The spirit of lawlessness (false teaching) had already begun. This fits the
rebellion (apostasy) described in this passage.

The man of lawlessness would use all sorts of displays of power. (A man
must have a miracle in his life before he can become the pope.)
"For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light."
 
(II Corinthians 11:13,14)

The apostasy was held back by the Roman government.
When the Roman government was removed in AD 100, the infant
papacy concept was no longer held in check.

Considering the facts, which idea is reasonable?
 
Stand Firm