"If living
matter is not, then, causes by an interplay of atoms, natural forces
and radiation, how has it come into being?...I think however, that we
must go further than this and admit that the only acceptable
explanation is creation. I know this is anathema to physicists, as
indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory we do not like if
experimental evidence supports it? (Physics
Bulletin, May, 1980)
"Since the time of
Darwin, paleontologists have found themselves confronted with evidence
that conflicts with gradualism, yet the message of the fossil record
has been ignored. This strange circumstance constitutes a remarkable
chapter in the history of science, and gives students of the fossil
record cause for concern." (The New
Biology, page 175)
"None of the
essential molecules of life, e.g., amino acids, could even be formed
under oxidizing conditions, and if by some chance they were, they
would decompose quickly. Chemical evolution would be impossible."
(The Mystery of Life's Origin, page 162)
"We have
proffered a collective tacit acceptance of the story of gradual
adaptive change, a story that strengthened and became more entrenched
as the synthesis took hold. We paleontologists have said that the
history of life supports that interpretation, all the while knowing it
does not." (The New Biology, page 175)
"The subject
of this chapter is Homo Erectus, and his story is a near-perfect
example of a wild surmise eventually made respectable." (Early
Man, p.77)
HMMMMM! These are only a
few of the quotes from scientist, but
it sounds like something is wrong here.